Monday, 23 May 2011

23-May-2011 - John ISON Does Seem To Exploit His Friends

 23-May-2011 - John ISON Does Seem To Exploit His Friends
& Defecate on His Own Doorstep With Alacrity.


Clearly on the evidence put forward John Ison is a truely repugnant little creep and it seems from his abject failure in the election and that he is under police investigation for his dishonesty we are assured public opinion supports the evidence!

QUOTE From A Public Forum:
...Steve - why would you think I'm not speaking to you? Its hard to pin you down due to your intermittent visits to this wee forum so pls don't assume I am giving you a cold shoulder. Bar-tender, a pint of Landlord for my fellow UKIPper Mr Morson if you please.

Seriously Steve, I mention Ison purely as an example for young Richard to remember when moderating perceived libels as I don't wish for Richard to appear partisan or inconsistent. I still don't know enough about Ison to judge him - they way he is spoken about, you would think he was Keyser Soze
Response:
Tip-top, old bean, I raise said glass of Timothy Taylor's Landlord to the hearty fellow, well met, and your health! ('Chink', sip.) I'm detemined that you should try Wye Valley HPA - on me - but of course, unilaterally-declared anonymity dictates it shall not be so. A shame, as it's rewardingly refreshing, fruity, and full of character with a throughly pleasing aftertaste. Just like meself

Normally, I get a directed comment from you in rebuttal, but hadn't had one for a while, so I assumed the worst. At times, I can be somewhat acidic, but I hope that my discussions are never so heated - among civilised people - that they cause offence.

But I keep to my original points, and of course the abiding offer already quoted. I will tread carefully while people are considering a legal strategy to redress my grievance. I wish they'd plan it a bit quicker (more cheaply!), but I really wish I didn't have to do it at all! Pride is such a terrible thing, and could prove ruinous. For him.

In this case, Keyser Soze is an absolutely fascinating parallel, from one of my all-time favourite films. (Your avatar is from my joint favourite, Twelve Angry Men, and the debut directorship of Sidney Lumet (may he RIP.))

I think Keyser Soze must be your favourite person's idol! He inveigled his way into people's trust and esteem, by using an alter ego, with the determined goal of causing their ultimate demise (Soze / Ison - take your pick). In my case seemingly becoming a good friend, in another (of an MEP) becoming a trusted employee. And what happened?

From almost day 1, both of us were betrayed with a viciousness and ruthlessness that can only be described as pathalogically cruel. Why? To eliminate competition for the 2014 MEP list? That's the only theory in this region among many people. I refer the honorable gentleman to my previous thread:-
Relative to an item Originally Posted by Steve Morson
...I have been the victim of an extremely nasty and totally unnecessary smear campaign recently, but of course, as a lowly branch chairman, it is of no consequence to the masses.

What is most staggering is that there was no conceivable, rational need or purpose for it; what is most puzzling is "why" it was done. That and - I suppose - the fact that its source is a member of the party's disciplinary committee. The choice of smear 'type' was also curious; it leaves one to ponder whether some of the more 'unsavoury' accusations made against the party have a foundation in truth. I will yield more by PM for those prepared to reveal their true identity under solemn promise - I will give my WORD - of utter secrecy.
To Continue:
Otherwise, why would someone with a 'law degree' be under investigation by the police for allegedly entering the office of a former employer and removing confidential documentation, in addition to many other allegations?

Why would that same person (a "good friend", remember?) spread a lie about me - that I am gay - to a "...wide but selective list of people...", including Greg Lance-Watkins?

Yes, that was one of the slurs I mentioned; hence (partly) my current course of action.

In order to keep my solicitor's blood pressure at a reasonable level, I'll say no more.

With great respect, when you reply to my posts it's almost as if you haven't absorbed them. My point was, it would be incredibly difficult for anyone to post anything that could be deemed libelous about this character, as by the nature of the beast shall he be known.

Richard is spot-on in post #55.

It is a complete non sequitur that you'd be concerned about a source of GL-W's. It's not logical, Captain.
.
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 - 62 65 62

No comments:

Post a Comment