Tuesday, 28 August 2012

Is John Ison to be Arrested for Perverting The Course of Justice?

Is John Ison to be Arrested for Perverting The Course of Justice?

Hi,

the posting below was placed on team Junius' blog related to UKIP but in the light of their increasing inactivity, aware, as they are, that UKIP is now of virtually zero significance in British domestic politics, nor likely to be of relevance in the foreseable future, when with the most glowing of poll results - NEVER reflected in actual ballot box results to date - UKIP after 20 years register a risible 12%, which places them nowhere near election of any positions of relevance, and unable even to control who might be elected should a given constituency inexplicably spike to give a double poll prediction, or more, result in isolation and a seat won!

I am therefore double posting by placing the comment made to Junius site at CLICK HERE, here also.




Hi,


one is inclined to wonder when John Ison will be arrested and bailed for what increasingly seems his actions to pervert the course of Justice - In his dishonest actions that were reported to the police by Nikki Sinclaire and witnessed by members of her staff I understand.

Many will be aware that John Ison claimed poverty yet would seem to have paid cash for 3 lotus Elans - whether for three girlfriends or as an investment I do not know.

I well remember the Elan when various girlfriends owned them back when they were newly launched but I only know of one man who has owned and driven them - he bought his about a year ago to do up for his daughter!

They are very much a young girl's car!
Ideal if you enjoy posing & putting your life at risk in a plastic washing up bowl!


In that Nigel Farage has been questioned seemingly relative to his association with John Ison and when Nikki Sinclaire 'parted company' with John Ison it seems he walked straight into a UKIP job and was assisting Paul Nuttall!

Increasingly it looks as if John Ison was no more than a placeman in Nikki Sinclaire's office = placed by UKIP leadership to foment problems and even perhaps pervert the course of justice by stealing material from her office in return for preferment by UKIP leadership and its unpleasant claque.

I gather it is known and documented that John Ison was acting in concert with Nigel Farage's sewer rat and goffer bully boy Mark Croucher - who seemingly used material stolen by John Ison!

In that Justice delayed is Justice denied one wonders why John Ison has not been arrested, or has he?

Similarly to what extent was it a political action on the part of the police to arrest Nikki Sinclaire and permit the arrest to leak into the hands of the media in seemingly the middle of the night!

It does rather seem that the police are increasingly struggling to 'build' any sort of credible case against Nikki Sinclaire and lack a credible witness to front such a construct!

Might it be that they now find themselves with egg on their faces and will either need to 'construct' a case founded on little truth - for believe you me that can be done as we saw in the murder on film of Ian Tomlinson by the gratuitous and excessive cowardly attack from behind by an armed and armoured police officer.

When politically motivated Justice, The Police and Courts are strangers, acting in their own interests!

Might it be that Nikki Sinclaire has been singled out for her active campaigning against EU membership and other issuesclose to the EU's heart and for embarrassing the government - thereby upsetting the cosy relationship of incompetence held by UKIP at large?

Could it be that the inconsequentiality and irrelevance of UKIP's being used as usefull idiots to provide the semblance of democracy as provided by such subourned castratti was unsettled by Sinclaire's very real achievements and participation on behalf of her electorate?

I fear that a trumped up case may be made against Sinclaire to cover for the egg on the face of the police and the risks of opening the can of worms of which John Ison may be the lid in exposing UKIP's underhanmd behaviour and roll as puppets for The EU and the political elite!

The truth is the ONE thing unlikely to become apparent in this entire sorry scam!

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

PS - being aware that The Team Junius are infrquently posting due to awareness of UKIP's obvious irrelevance in future British domestic politics - I will also post this comment as a free standing posting on the John Ison blog at:
www.John-Ison.blogspot.com





Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 - 528 337
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, 30 July 2012

UKIP: Jon Ison continues his destruction in the West Midlands

Monday, 30 July 2012


UKIP: Jon Ison continues his destruction in the West Midlands

A West Midlands regional membership spread sheet, showing the variations in membership numbers by month shown to the Junius team reveal that its Solihull and Meriden Branch chairman John Ison has set a new party record in losing his association a staggering 16 members since April 2012, that’s nearly a 30% decrease in just 4 months!
Ison has resided over the collapse of the (until recently) largest branch in the West Midlands! Before he took over the branch was thriving had 100+ members, BUT is now down to a pitiful 45 members. (So a near loss of 65 members over his entire chairmanship of just over 12 months!)
In the same period all branch activity as stopped, before ISON took over the branch it had 17 candidates in place for the 2010 local elections. This year he didn’t put up a single candidate!
Proof that more and more people are distancing themselves from this vindictive and largely untrustworthy individual !
Mr Ison now appears to ruling his sinking ship with an iron fist to hold some level of position within UKIP. Aware of his own local unpopularity Ison has refused on hold an AGM for the branch fearing that a vote of no confidence will be issued and passed against him!
Constitutionally this is not allowed though how much longer will UKIP let it continue???????? Will the West Midlands RO step in a either to dissolve the branch or demand an EGM to hold the yearly elections as per party rules ?




isn't Gordon Parkin having the same result in his region for much the same reasons? Also I do gather that other than their own personal interests Peter Reeve & Lisa Duffy are having a near catastrophic effect in their region and with UKIP Yoof!
 
Then of course we note the catastrophic behaviour of Derek Clark who has not only abused his office and the trust of the electorate but lied to his committee, his members and his electorate and been aided by his hugely over salaried staff Ron Ransome The Regional Organiser and his wife in their region.

The abysmal results and general embarrassment of the results in London are irrefutable and as London MEP Gerard Batten has shown the public clearly reject his racist views and incitement to race hate as he works with extremist groups and criminals to promote his personal values (or transparent lack of!).

That the party chairman was sat upon to carry the can and pretended to resign speaks volumes - that even this turned out to be a dishonest move and he is still publishing idiotic newsletters as Party Chairman is plain for all to see. Clearly no one of gravitas, competence or integrity sat on that particular 'Chair' with any plausible effect!

Clearly the party lacks any credible leadership or understanding of duty, integrity, morality or responsibility - Farage is on record stating UK elections dont matter! Well no, not to him as his pockets are stuffed with the bribes of The EU!
 

UKIP couldn't care less about honesty, probity, democracy or basic common decency it is clear.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 - 528 337
on: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
&: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com  


~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 - 528 337
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar<  
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com  
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com  
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com  
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide of OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN & To Leave-The-EU 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, 8 March 2012

Is John ISON's Behaviour Greed or Malicious sexual Revenge?

Is John ISON's Behaviour Greed or Malicious sexual Revenge?

Hi,

although these facts about John Ison have been a matter of record and alluded to previously on this blog we note that for all UKIP's proscribing of many decent individuals they have always had a propensity to promote those they have control over by holdng facts over their heads.

Let us not forget Nigel Farage's personal sewer rat who trolled amongst his associates in the extremist and fascist branches of politics he frequented with his distortions and lies on Farage's behalf in fact in Farage's pay, building dossiers that could be used to control and manipulate people.

UKIP have used this useful idiot John Ison to lie and defame one of UKIP's longest serving and clearly most dedicated supporters Nikki Sinclaire who Nigel Farage has always feared and tried to undermine.


It has been Nigel Farage's poorly hidden hand in many attacks mounted upon Nikkie Sinclaire that has cost UKIP dear in the courts and shown them for the bullying, cyber stalkers, cowards and anti homosexual small minded self serving bigots they all too often are.


John Ison as you will have noted is all too typical of the unreliable low lifes that serve the purposes of UKIP leadership and are gullible enough to be duped into their dishonest behaviour not out of malice but in greed all too often.

That there was agressive abuse in the relationship seems in little doubt and that his wife left him for another woman having shown in Court he was an unfit parent is on record and may explain his vindictive and largely untrustworthy behaviour in stealing material from Nikki Sinclaire, an openly stated homosexual - Is this just an attack on a Lesbian by a sad individual deeply challenged by his own inditerminate sexuality and/or a hatred of female homosexuals!


Junius having published more of the facts than I would have done heretofore - that they are not only a matter of official public record but have been re-aired by UKIP supporters on The Junius blog, who as supporters like me are keen to see UKIP cleaned up and rendered fit for purpose and worthy of votes by the informed not just the uninformed and tyhe gutter sweepings seeking preferment HERE is the posting:

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

UKIP: John Ison was once accused of trying to strangle his wife

John Ison: The man behind the allegations against Nikki Sinclaire - all with a little help from Nigel Farage

There has been much discussion on various forums and within UKIP's leadership cabal recently, about the antics of John Ison. Particularly, his appearance in court in August 2003 to answer charges of assaulting his wife.

In fact, a look at the court records reveals that he was actually accused of trying to strangle his wife.

Although cleared due to "lack of corroborative evidence" Ison admitted striking his wife on the nose. She also suffered a bruised right leg and right arm and was signed off work by her doctor.

In his defence, Ison claimed that he was actually the victim himself, and that his wife tried to strike him first.

In fact, there may be a hint of truth in this, as we can reveal that Ison was an abused husband. In 2002 he was the victim of an assault by his wife, being punched in the face as he was driving his car. A solicitor's letter to this effect was produced during his 2003 court case.

The fact, however, that Ison was banned by court order from going near his own children hints at a sad domestic situation in which violence was all to common.

It is said that all political careers end in failure. With the disclosure of Ison's past, it would appear that his has ended before it got off the ground!

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
. .
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 - 528 337
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar<  
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com  
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com  
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com  
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide of OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN & To Leave-The-EU 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, 4 March 2012

A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!

 A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!

Hi,

it is interesting to note the obvious disgust at John Ison's behaviour and revulsion at the unprofessional behaviour of UKIP leadership in their anti homosexual and vindictive treatment of Nikki Sinclaire, on a UKIP controlled Forum!

It is all but impossible for UKIP to claim it is not anti homosexual and now especially with the addition of the supporter of Tom Wise!

Roger Helmer defedtee from the Tories because he could not get his own way when he stepped down as an MEP, he who set out to try to have the deffinition of where his house was, in order to try to claim even more expenses as an MEP!

Roger Helmer recently stated his opinion that homosexuality was a treatable mental illness - surely the world left that view behind in the 1960s, when we campaigned for the decriminalisation of homosexual acts between consenting adults. I should imagine The Tories are glad to see the back of this idiotic man with his arcane views and his plastic EUroScepticism as he milks the system for all it is worth TO HIM!
  1. Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    828
    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Fonzarelli View Post
    Depending on which side of the Miss Sinclaire/Mr Ison 'conflict' one finds oneself on, one could feel that the other is only interested in smearing them.
    One could, or one could try to think beyond the purely superficial.

    In January 2010, UKIP's NEC unwisely allowed itself to be dragged into what was basically a personal spat between two MEPs, Sinclaire and Farage.

    The correct course would have been to tell Nigel Farage that the NEC had no constitutional power to compel MEPs to join a particular group (which it hadn't), and that any complaint about Nikki Sinclaire leaving the EFD should be submitted through the party's disciplinary channel. That would have forced Farage to demonstrate exactly how Sinclaire had breached UKIP's rules (if she had), provided an opportunity for mediation, and ensured that if necessary the matter be decided in the proper way by the discipline committee (from which NEC members are barred).

    Instead of which, the chairman of the NEC foolishly issued a statement Statement from UKIP chairman - UK Independence Party on behalf of the committee, announcing that Sinclaire would not be permitted to stand for UKIP at future elections on the grounds of her having left the EP group, and having "failed to declare other relevant issues to the interview panel when she was selected as a UKIP candidate" (which she denied). If Sinclaire chose to challenge this legally, as past experience suggested she might, any breach of normal disciplinary procedure or evidence of her having been treated less favourably than others in similar situations, would obviously disadvantage UKIP hugely.

    Within a matter of months, first Mike Nattrass then Trevor Colman followed her out of the EFD, yet no action was taken against them by the NEC and, unlike Sinclaire, both are still accepted as UKIP MEPs and listed as such on the party website.

    Now we see that the article linked by Alex McKee at #9 raises the possibility that the second of the accusations levelled at Sinclaire - that of failing to declare relevant issues to a candidate selection panel - may also have applied to John Ison.

    Ison stood as UKIP candidate in Redditch in 2005 and Solihull in 2010, being bound by the party constitution on both occasions to make "a written application and shall make full disclosure of any fact, political or personal, that may have a bearing on their suitability for selection as a candidate". In 2010 the application form stated: "I am not aware of any circumstances from my past that might cause embarrassment to the party were it to be revealed".

    Did Ison fail to declare that he had been banned by court order from seeing his children, and lie by signing the form anyway? If so, now that the story is known through circulation on the internet, the NEC will be guilty of victimizing Nikki Sinclaire if it doesn't ban Ison from standing in all future elections just as it has banned her.

    If he did declare it and was allowed to stand despite this, the party and all its future candidates will be at risk from resulting bad publicity, but why would a party that goes to the length of demanding CRB checks on its candidates precisely in order to screen out potential problems, regard a court order protecting five-year-olds from their own father as not having a bearing on his suitability as a candidate?
    Reply With Quote
  2. #23
    Senior Member Steve Morson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wonderful Worcestershire
    Posts
    734
    Quote Originally Posted by Barboo View Post
    One could, or one could try to think beyond the purely superficial.....
    And indeed you do, Barboo. A quite stunning post, extraordinarily well-informed and astute.

    The questions it raises, which I asked myself on being informed of the archive article on the court case only recently, are for members of the party. Which is why I did not ask them publicly.

    What a mess.
    Steve
  3. #24
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,475
    Quote Originally Posted by Barboo View Post
    Did Ison fail to declare that he had been banned by court order from seeing his children, and lie by signing the form anyway?
    I've no idea what Ison has or has not declared but he was pre-UKIP a notable public campaigner for fathers rights. How have you come to the apparent conclusion that his own circumstances were not already in the public domain?
    Reply With Quote
  4. #26
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    828
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Morson View Post
    And indeed you do, Barboo. A quite stunning post, extraordinarily well-informed and astute.
    Thank you, Steve!

  5. #27
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    828
    Quote Originally Posted by Independent UKIP View Post
    I've no idea what Ison has or has not declared but he was pre-UKIP a notable public campaigner for fathers rights. How have you come to the apparent conclusion that his own circumstances were not already in the public domain?

    I haven't come to any conclusion on the matter and that is not the point. UKIP's constitution does not put responsibility onto candidate selection panels for acquainting themselves with applicants' personal circumstances from what is in the public domain. It states categorically that candidates shall make full disclosure.

    If John Ison did not do so then natural justice demands that he should be treated the same as Nikki Sinclaire in what the NEC claims was a similar circumstance (failure to disclose, which she denies), and banned as she was from standing in future elections. Not to ban Ison would be a second example of Sinclaire being treated more harshly than others, the first being that action was taken against her for leaving the EFD but not against Nattrass and Colman.
  6. #28
    Uber Member Niall Warry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Somerset
    Posts
    7,406
    It is very simple really Nigel doesn't concern himself with rule books, as I've had experience of, by his selfish standards there is one rule for him and his mates and another for his foes.
You may be interested to note YET AGAIN that the false accusation of failure to disclose made against Nikki Sinclaire was an unprofessional pack of lies from UKIP Leadership and pure discrimination.

Nikki Sinclaire was madse technically bankrupt (ie based on the claim of one man who served p0apers at an address at which she clearly did not live as she washelping UKIP set up their head office in Birmingham!).

The details were IMMEDIATELY reported by Nikki Sinclaire to The Returning Officer in the election, in which she stood. She also informed Michael Zucherman The UKIP Part Secretary at the time.

I also published the full details at the time as they were a matter of public record, as is the fact that John Ison was not found guilty in a Court Case of assault on his wife who left him for another woman but WAS deemed unfit to have access to his children, presumably his volatile temper or underhand behaviour were deemed a risk to children.


As to bankruptcy being ostensibly a cause of the UKIP Leadership's unprofessional and partisan behaviour the Guilty Judgement against Nigel Farage, Godfrey Bloom and UKIP inCourt would seem to indicate otherwise as would the official caution from the EU Parliament aganst Godfrey Bloom for his anti homosexual bullying.


It is interesting to note that John Ison's vindictive and malicious behaviour against Nikki Sinclaire and his various thefts and seeming 'construction' of so called evidence, in collusion with others (including the proven corrupt Christopher Gill see: CLICK HERE) may all be a vindictive attack based on John Ison's seemingly very 'challenged' sexuality and unhappy marriage!


Nikki Sinclaire's treatment at the hands of UKIP's partyisan and unprofessional leadership can not be on the grounds of her historic bankruptcy reported at the time, despite the clamourings of Nigel Farage's sewer rat Mark Croucher who we KNOW colluded in what seems clearly to be efforts to set Nikki Sinclaire up to curry favour with Nigel Farage!


I say it can not be based on the irrefutable fact that Niel Hamilton the formerly disgraced Tory MP was courted by Farage and joined UKIP some 5 years ago and is now, we understand, promised a leading seat as a contender for election to public office once more and as is also a matter of record he was bankrupt and was recently boasting of it on national TV.


Perhaps Niall Warry was correct that in the corrupt world of UKIP:
It is very simple really Nigel doesn't concern himself with rule books, as I've had experience of, by his selfish standards there is one rule for him and his mates and another for his foes.
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 - 528 337
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com  
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar<  
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com  
eneral Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com  
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com  
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide of OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN & To Leave-The-EU 
Enhanced by Zemanta